Irmen culture

Irmen culture is located in Continental Asia
-1000
Irmen culture
Karasuk
Irmen
Begazy-Dandybai
culture
Mezhovskaya
culture
Cimmerians
Iranian
pastoral
people
Slab-
graves
Kuban
culture
ASSYRIA
ELAM
Mumun
Arameans
Painted
Grey Ware
Swat
Kuru
Chust
Subeshi
Upper
Xiajiadian
Siwa
culture
Shanma
Deer
stones
ZHOU
DYNASTY
San-
xingdui
Ulaan-
zuukh
KUSH
21st
Dynasty
of Egypt
General location of the Irmen culture (), and contemporary Asian polities

Geographical rangeSouth SiberiaDates9th to 8th centuries BCEPreceded byKarasuk culture, Andronovo cultureFollowed bySaka culture
City-like, fortified settlement of the Late Irmen culture (late Bronze Age, c. 1100 BC) in Tchitcha, west Siberia
Eurasian archaeological cultures in the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1500–750 BCE) with their approximate ranges (Cultures in the Seima-Turbino zone are indicated with blue letters).[1]
Preceded by the Pleistocene
Holocene
Epoch

ICS stages/ages (official)


Greenlandian (11.7*–8.236* ka)
Northgrippian (8.236–4.2† ka)
Meghalayan (4.2 ka–present)

Blytt–Sernander stages/ages


Preboreal (10.3†–9† ka)
Boreal (9–7.5† ka)
Atlantic (7.55† ka)
Subboreal (52.5† ka)
Subatlantic (2.5 ka–present)

*Relative to year 2000 (b2k).

†Relative to year 1950 (BP/Before "Present").
  • v
  • t
  • e

Irmen culture (Russian: Ирменская культура, romanizedIrmenskaya kul'tura) is an indigenous Late Bronze Age culture of animal breeders in the steppe and forest steppe area of the Ob river middle course, north of Altai in western Siberia, dated to around the 9th to 8th centuries BCE. Monuments of this advanced bronze-producing culture include numerous settlements and kurgan cemeteries, the culture was named after Irmen kurgan cemetery now flooded by Novosibirsk reservoir.[2] Irmen culture was discovered and described by N.L.Chlenova in 1970.[3]

Irmen culture period is noted for migrationary waves in two directions, in the beginning of 1st millennium BCE from south from the Karasuk culture, and later in the 1st millennium BCE of northern tribes notable for their cross-decorated ceramics. Migrations raised military tensions, noted in emergence of first fortified settlements with moats and ramparts.[4]

Economy

The mainstay of the Irmen economy was extensive animal husbandry. Stationary houses of Irmen people were large, sometimes exceeding 100 m2 (1,100 sq ft). Villages had several such large dwellings. Next to houses were found large deposits of ash.[5]

Archeology

Irmen people buried their deceased by inhumation in kurgan cemeteries, with up to 17 predominantly oriented SW graves in a single kurgan, bodies in crouched position, except when inhumation was conducted after ground thawed or bodies were first exposed, and bone remains were mixed. Kurgans were encircled by sometimes rectangular trenches open at the entrance, deposits include vessels and animal bones of funeral feasts. Individual graves were framed with wooden logs, covered by logs laid across. Accompanying inventory furnished ceramic vessels with food, darts with bronze heads, knives, deceased wore bronze jewelry ornaments of earrings, pendants, bead necklaces. Irmen dishes are of household and finery type with geometric ornament and rounded bottoms, finery dishes have mostly flat bottom. Ornamentation of finery dishes is much closer to the Karasuk vessels than of the household ceramics, but ornamentation is similar for both groups.[6]

Genetic composition

In general, migration wave of Andronovo cultural-historical community tribes, where their physical type (anthropologically ascended to the Southern Eurasian Anthropological Formation), conflated with local tribes (anthropologically ascended to the Northern Eurasian Anthropological Formation) and went on ethnogenesis of the Andronoid cultures.[7] The phenotype features of Irmen people are distinctive, they developed from the local Eneolithic culture, in its formation participated Caucasoid population of Eastern Mediterranean type, migrants from Central Asia.[8]

References

  1. ^ Török, Tibor (July 2023). "Integrating Linguistic, Archaeological and Genetic Perspectives Unfold the Origin of Ugrians". Genes. 14 (7): 1345. doi:10.3390/genes14071345. ISSN 2073-4425. PMC 10379071. PMID 37510249.
  2. ^ Irmen culture. Archaeology and Ethnography Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences http://www.sati.archaeology.nsc.ru/encyc_p/term.html?act=list&term=766 Archived 13 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine (In Russian)
  3. ^ Chlenova N.L., Dating of Irmen culture//Chronology and cultural affiliation problems of archaeological sites in Western Siberia, Tomsk, 1970, pp. 133–149 (In Russian)
  4. ^ "Irmen culture". Archived from the original on 13 November 2013. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
  5. ^ "Irmen culture". Archived from the original on 13 November 2013. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
  6. ^ "Irmen culture". Archived from the original on 13 November 2013. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
  7. ^ Chikisheva T.A., "Dynamics of anthropological differentiation", section Conclusions
  8. ^ "Althisto.ru expired". Archived from the original on 29 October 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2012.

Literature

  • Kosarev M.F., "Bronze Age in Western Siberia", Moscow, 1981 (In Russian)
  • Kosarev M.F., "Origin of Irmen culture"//Monuments of Eurasia Stone and Bronze Ages. Moscow, 1966. pp. 169–175, in Kosarev M.F., "Ancient cultures of Tomsk-Narym Ob area", Moscow, 1974 (In Russian)
  • Chlenova N.L., Dating of Irmen culture//Chronology and cultural affiliation problems of archaeological sites in Western Siberia, Tomsk, 1970, pp. 133–149 (In Russian)
  • Chikisheva T.A., Dynamics of anthropological differentiation in population of southern Western Siberia in Neolithic – Early Iron Age, Professorial dissertation, Novosibirsk, 2010, section Conclusions http://www.dissercat.com/content/dinamika-antropologicheskoi-differentsiatsii-naseleniya-yuga-zapadnoi-sibiri-v-epokhi-neolit (In Russian)